Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CAMDERELI v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (victim) Violation of Art. 3 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (20)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  Moreover, the Court notes that the proceedings in question did not produce any result due to the application of Law no. 4616, which created virtual impunity for the perpetrator of the acts of violence (see, mutatis mutandis, Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 147, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts), and Abdülsamet Yaman, cited above, § 59).
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57945/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  If this were not the case, the general legal prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment, despite its fundamental importance, would be ineffective in practice and it would be possible in some cases for agents of the State to abuse the rights of those within their control with virtual impunity (see Assenov and Others, cited above, § 102; Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942/00 and 57945/00, § 177, 24 February 2005, and Zeynep Özcan v. Turkey, cited above, § 40).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  Moreover, the Court notes that the proceedings in question did not produce any result due to the application of Law no. 4616, which created virtual impunity for the perpetrator of the acts of violence (see, mutatis mutandis, Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 147, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts), and Abdülsamet Yaman, cited above, § 59).

• EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 34738/04

  YESIL ET SEVIM c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  In this context, the Court reiterates its earlier finding in a number of cases that the Turkish criminal law system has proved to be far from rigorous and has had no dissuasive effect capable of ensuring the effective prevention of unlawful acts perpetrated by State agents when the criminal proceedings brought against the latter are suspended due to the application of Law no. 4616 (see Nevruz Koç, § 54, cited above, Yesil and Sevim v. Turkey, no. 34738/04, § 42, 5 June 2007).
• EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 18207/03

  NEVRUZ KOÇ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  Therefore, in such cases, an effective investigation must be able to lead to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see, mutatis mutandis, Nevruz Koç v. Turkey, no. 18207/03, § 53, 12 June 2007).
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that these provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 109, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99

  OKKALI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time are outlined in the following judgments: Okkalı v. Turkey, (no. 52067/99, § 47, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)), and Çalısır v. Turkey (no. 52165/99, §§ 17-19, 21 February 2006).
• EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 56760/00

  AKPINAR AND ALTUN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  In these circumstances, the Court dismisses the Government's argument and finds that the applicant was not required to embark on another attempt to obtain redress by bringing an administrative law action for damages (see, for example, Akpınar and Altun v. Turkey, no. 56760/00, § 68, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.10.2006 - 57406/00

  CEVIK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  At the outset the Court notes that some of the applicant's references to the alleged ill-treatment could be construed as also including the verbal abuse she had allegedly received from Mr M.A.G. and Mr M.G. However, the Court notes that, even assuming that this is the case, and even if the applicant was subjected to threats and/or verbal abuse as alleged and that, as a result, she felt apprehension or disquiet, the Court reiterates that such feelings are not sufficient to amount to degrading treatment, within the meaning of Article 3 (see, in particular, Çevik v. Turkey (dec.), no. 57406/00, 10 October 2006).
• EGMR, 21.02.2006 - 52165/99

  ÇALISIR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

  The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time are outlined in the following judgments: Okkalı v. Turkey, (no. 52067/99, § 47, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)), and Çalısır v. Turkey (no. 52165/99, §§ 17-19, 21 February 2006).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 22978/05

  Gäfgen - Folter bei polizeilicher Vernehmung; Kindesentführung; Geständnis trotz …

  Zum einen müssen die staatlichen Behörden gründliche und wirksame Ermittlungen durchgeführt haben, die geeignet waren, zur Identifizierung und Bestrafung der Verantwortlichen zu führen (…siehe u.a. Krastanov, a.a.O., Rdnr. 48; Çamdereli ./. Türkei, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 28433/02, Rdnrn. 28-29, 17. Juli 2008;… und Vladimir Romanov, a.a.O., Rdnrn. 79 und 81).
• EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 6884/11

  Polizeigewalt bei G8 in Genua 2001: Italien verurteilt

  Elles sont essentielles si l'on veut préserver l'effet dissuasif du système judiciaire en place et le rôle qu'il est tenu d'exercer dans la prévention des atteintes à l'interdiction des mauvais traitements (Çamdereli c. Turquie, no 28433/02, § 38, 17 juillet 2008, Gäfgen, § 121, Saba, précité, § 76 ; sur le terrain de l'article 2, voir aussi Nikolova et Velitchkova c. Bulgarie, no 7888/03, §§ 60 et suivants, 20 décembre 2007).
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  [FRE]

  Or, de l'avis de la Cour, cette demande de la requérante n'était pas superflue pour l'identification des agents de police impliqués dans les incidents et la découverte des éventuels responsables, comme exigé par la jurisprudence de la Cour (voir, entre autres, Krastanov c. Bulgarie, no 50222/99, § 48, 30 septembre 2004, Çamdereli c. Turquie, no 28433/02, §§ 28-29, 17 juillet 2008, et Vladimir Romanov c. Russie, no 41461/02, §§ 79 et 81, 24 juillet 2008).

• EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 28923/09

  AZZOLINA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE et 1 autre affaire

  Ils citent à cet effet les arrêts Assenov et autres c. Bulgarie, (28 octobre 1998, § 71, Recueil 1998-VIII), Gäfgen (précité, § 119), Krastanov c. Bulgarie (no 50222/99, § 60, 30 septembre 2004), Çamdereli c. Turquie (no 28433/02, § 29, 17 juillet 2008), et Vladimir Romanov (précité, § 78).
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09

  [FRE]

  Firstly, the State authorities must have conducted a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see, inter alia, Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 48, 30 September 2004; Çamdereli v. Turkey, no. 28433/02, §§ 28-29, 17 July 2008; and Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461/02, §§ 79 and 81, 24 July 2008, cited above).
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 36629/10

  SABA c. ITALIE

  En cas, comme en l'espèce, de mauvais traitement délibéré infligé par des agents de l'État au mépris de l'article 3, 1a Cour estime de manière constante que les autorités internes doivent mener une enquête approfondie et effective pouvant conduire à l'identification et à la punition des responsables (voir, entre autres, Çamdereli c. Turquie, no 28433/02, §§ 28-29, 17 juillet 2008 ; et Gäfgen, précité, § 116).
• EGMR, 25.09.2019 - 36617/07

  AFET SÜREYYA EREN AGAINST TURKEY AND 130 OTHER CASES

  28433/02.
• EGMR, 11.04.2019 - 38089/12

  SARWARI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

  Deuxièmement, le requérant doit, le cas échéant, percevoir une compensation (Vladimir Romanov c. Russie, no 41461/02, § 79, 24 juillet 2008) ou, du moins, avoir la possibilité de demander et d'obtenir une indemnité pour le préjudice que lui a causé le mauvais traitement (comparer, mutatis mutandis, Nikolova et Velitchkova c. Bulgarie, no 7888/03, § 56, 20 décembre 2007 (concernant une violation de l'article 2 de la Convention), Çamdereli c. Turquie, no 28433/02, § 29, 17 juillet 2008, Yeter c. Turquie, no 33750/03, § 58, 13 janvier 2009, et Gäfgen, précité, § 116).
• EGMR, 05.05.2015 - 1454/09

  [FRE]

  Ces éléments sont essentiels si l'on veut préserver l'effet dissuasif du système judiciaire en place et le rôle qu'il est censé avoir dans la prévention des atteintes à l'interdiction des mauvais traitements (Ali et Ayşe Duran c. Turquie, no 42942/02, § 62, 8 avril 2008 ; Austrianu c. Roumanie, no 16117/02, § 74, 12 février 2013 ; Çamdereli c. Turquie, no 28433/02, § 38, 17 juillet 2008, et, mutatis mutandis, Nikolova et Velitchkova, précité, §§ 60 et suiv.).
• EGMR, 26.04.2012 - 41356/08

  BUTOLEN v. SLOVENIA

  Having regard to the foregoing, the Court considers that the civil courts acknowledged in substance that the applicant's treatment had not been compatible with his right enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention (see Çamdereli v. Turkey, no. 28433/02, § 27, 17 July 2008).
• EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 34588/07

  DARRAJ c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 12294/07

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 22339/03

  TUNA c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 16117/02

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 9207/03

  EVRIM ÖKTEM c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 51143/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 48475/09

  SAKIR c. GRÈCE
• VG Köln, 07.12.2016 - 21 K 5766/15
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 11014/05

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 19180/03

  NAFIYE ÇETIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY