Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5-3 Violations of Art. 5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (282)Zitiert selbst (17)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  However the Government did not demonstrate what redress could have been afforded to the applicant by those authorities, taking into account that the problems arising from the conditions of her detention were apparently of a structural nature and did not only concern her personal situation (see Moiseyev v. Russia (dec.), no. 62936/00, 9 December 2004; Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, 18 September 2001).

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III).

• EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  The applicant was not obliged to co-operate with the authorities and she cannot be blamed for having taken full advantage of her right to silence (see, mutadis mutandis, YaÄŸcı and Sargın v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-A, § 66; W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, § 42).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  The Court considers that these four periods cannot be considered compatible with the "speediness" requirement of Article 5 § 4, especially taking into account that their entire duration was attributable to the authorities (see, for example, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2000-XII, where the review proceedings which lasted twenty-three days were not "speedy").

• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  The applicant was not obliged to co-operate with the authorities and she cannot be blamed for having taken full advantage of her right to silence (see, mutadis mutandis, YaÄŸcı and Sargın v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-A, § 66; W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, § 42).
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 17977/91

  KAMPANIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  The possibility for a detainee to be heard either in person or through some form of representation features among the fundamental guarantees of procedure applied in matters of deprivation of liberty (see Kampanis v. Greece, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 318-B, § 47).
• EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 67175/01

  REINPRECHT c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  Although it is not always necessary that the procedure under Article 5 § 4 be attended by the same guarantees as those required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for criminal or civil litigation, it must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question (see Reinprecht v. Austria, no. 67175/01, § 31, ECHR 2005-...., with further references).
• EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 25792/94

  TRZASKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  In the case of a person whose detention falls within the ambit of Article 5 § 1 (c), a hearing is required (see Trzaska v. Poland, no. 25792/94, § 74, 11 July 2000).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 152 and 153, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of lack of personal space afforded to detainees (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 39 et seq., 20 January 2005; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 04.12.1979 - 7710/76

  Schiesser ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05

  In this connection the Court recalls that Article 5 § 3 obliges the "officer" to hear himself the accused, to examine all the facts militating for and against pre-trial detention and to set out in the decision on detention the facts upon which that decision is based (see Hood v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27267/95, § 60, ECHR 1999-I; Schiesser v. Switzerland, judgment of 4 December 1979, Series A no. 34, § 31).
• EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 66460/01

  NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96

  ILIJKOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 08.02.2005 - 45100/98

  PANCHENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

  LETELLIER c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 38884/97

  NIKOLOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 54071/00

  ROKHLINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.10.2003 - 38654/97

  GORAL v. POLAND

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  [ENG]

  However, it reiterated its finding made in a number of cases that financial or logistical difficulties, as well as the lack of a positive intention to humiliate or debase the applicant, could not be relied upon by the domestic authorities as circumstances relieving them of their obligation to organise the State's penitentiary system in such a way as to ensure respect for the dignity of detainees (see, among other authorities, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 63, 1 June 2006).

  Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006 (IZ-33/1, Vladimir, 2004-2005).

• EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 60367/08

  Khamtokhu und Aksenchik ./. Russland: Lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe nur für Männer …

  See Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 73, 1 June 2006.
• EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

  VARGA v. HUNGARY and 78 other applications

  However, the Court notes that, given the intangible nature of the right protected under Article 3 of the Convention, it is incumbent on the respondent Government to organise its penitentiary system in such a way that ensures respect for the dignity of detainees, regardless of financial or logistical difficulties (see Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 63, 1 June 2006).

• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

  [FRE]

  See, among other authorities, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 84, ECHR 2000-XII; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006; G.B. v. Switzerland, no. 27426/95, § 33, 30 November 2000; and Kadem v. Malta, no. 55263/00, § 44, 9 January 2003.
• EGMR, 15.10.2026 - 52652/20

  ZAKUTNIY v. UKRAINE and 7 other applications

  Lastly, the Court reiterates that, as it has held in a number of cases, financial or logistical difficulties, as well as the absence of any intention to humiliate or debase a detainee, cannot be relied on by the domestic courts as grounds for reducing the amount of compensation (see, among other authorities, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 63, 1 June 2006, and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 117).
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 38004/12

  Mariya Alekhina u.a. ./. Russland - "Pussy Riot"-Urteil verletzt Meinungsfreiheit

  It has found a violation of that Article on the grounds that the domestic courts extended an applicant's detention by relying essentially on the gravity of the charges and using stereotyped formulae without addressing his or her specific situation or considering alternative preventive measures (see, among many other authorities, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; and Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012).
• EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 31147/20

  GASHKOV v. RUSSIA

  Where an individual's personal liberty is at stake, the Court has very strict standards concerning the State's compliance with the requirement of speedy review of the lawfulness of detention (see, for example, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006, where the length of appeal proceedings lasting, inter alia, twenty-six days, was found to be in breach of the "speediness" requirement of Article 5 § 4).

  Mamedova, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006).

  Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006).

• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 37717/05

  Die Kommunikation mit dem Verteidiger darf nicht abgehört werden, egal wann

  The Court has already, on a large number of occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention and found a violation of that Article on the grounds that the domestic courts had extended an applicant's detention relying essentially on the gravity of the charges and using stereotyped formulae without addressing his or her specific situation or considering alternative preventive measures (see, among many others, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Pshevecherskiy v. Russia, no. 28957/02, 24 May 2007; Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007; Belov v. Russia, no. 22053/02, 3 July 2008; Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no. 15217/07, 12 March 2009; Lamazhyk v. Russia, no. 20571/04, 30 July 2009; Makarenko v. Russia, no. 5962/03, 22 December 2009; Gultyayeva v. Russia, no. 67413/01, 1 April 2010; Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511/04, 17 June 2010; Sutyagin v. Russia, no. 30024/02, 3 May 2011; Romanova v. Russia, no. 23215/02, 11 October 2011; Valeriy Samoylov v. Russia, no. 57541/09, 24 January 2012; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 108-11, 27 November 2012; and Zherebin v. Russia, no. 51445/09, §§ 59-63, 24 March 2016).
• EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 18837/06

  ALLEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Against this background, the Court recalls its earlier case-law concerning the question of whether an applicant's attendance is required for the purposes of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006; Grauzinis v. Lithuania, no. 37975/97, 10 October 2000 and Jankauskas v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 59304/00, 16 December 2003).

  seeking release from detention on remand, the applicant relied on the appalling conditions of detention, of which her counsel had no first-hand knowledge (Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, 1 June 2006); and where the case called for an assessment of the applicant's character or mental state (Mamedova v. Russia, cited above; Duda v. Poland, no. 67016/01, 19 December 2006).

  For me, the question that should have been considered by the Chamber was whether the applicant needed to be personally present in order "to give satisfactory information and instructions to her counsel" (see Mamedova v. Russia, no 7064/05, § 91, 1 June 2006).

• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 20756/04

  ISAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Having regard to the above, the Court considers that the present case is different from many previous Russian cases where a violation of Article 5 § 3 was found because the domestic courts had extended an applicant's detention relying essentially on the gravity of the charges without addressing specific facts or considering alternative preventive measures (see, among many others, Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, §§ 99 et seq., 1 March 2007; Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, §§ 103 et seq., ECHR 2006-... (extracts); and Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, §§ 72 et seq., 1 June 2006).

  The Court therefore finds that these two periods cannot be considered compatible with the "speediness" requirement of Article 5 § 4, especially taking into account that their entire duration was attributable to the authorities (see, for example, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 198 and 203; and Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2000-XII, where review proceedings which lasted twenty-three days were found not to have been "speedy").

• EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 62936/00

  MOISEYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03

  SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 2708/02

  VLADIMIR SOLOVYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.05.2014 - 19554/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 46108/11

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 36941/02

  GUBKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.08.2026 - 5195/17

  GHUKASYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 55352/12

  Verstoß Maltas gegen Art. 3 EMRK
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 03.03.2011 - 5235/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5774/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 7077/06

  FORTALNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 16262/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 38726/05

  PELEVIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 5453/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 33023/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 16264/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 24202/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 20197/03

  MIMINOSHVILI v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 15217/07

  ALEKSANDR MAKAROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.07.2008 - 3130/03

  SUDARKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.12.2020 - 42732/12

  ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 33099/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 29431/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17885/04

  ORCHOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06

  FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 5962/03

  MAKARENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 30033/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 22107/03

  ANTROPOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 25664/05

  LIND v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 65734/01

  SHUKHARDIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 17564/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17599/05

  NORBERT SIKORSKI c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01

  BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 45373/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5903/10

  STRUCL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 38623/03

  PICHUGIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 67253/01

  BABUSHKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 106/02

  BENEDIKTOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 9096/09

  ABASHEV CONTRE LA RUSSIE ET 122 AUTRES AFFAIRES
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13

  KHLOYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 51857/13

  AMIROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 3242/03

  GLADKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 205/02

  Menschenrechtsgericht rügt erneut Haftbedingungen in Russland
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 11353/06

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 03.03.2011 - 6110/03

  KUPTSOV AND KUPTSOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 44973/04

  PREMININY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 20571/04

  LAMAZHYK v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03

  SELEZNEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.01.2012 - 39884/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 41833/04

  YEVGENIY ALEKSEYENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 36932/02

  BAKHMUTSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 11436/06

  MITYANIN v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 41794/04

  CHUMAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 71572/01

  BAZJAKS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 24650/02

  GULIYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 48023/06

  VASENIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.02.2015 - 22405/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 61767/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 45875/06

  RAFIG ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 67413/01

  GULTYAYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 38971/06

  KORSHUNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 29744/13

  ZOGRAFOS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 43149/10

  SMIRNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 35377/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 38510/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 16794/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 26676/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 21056/11

  NORKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 14248/05

  TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA (NO. 2)
• EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 2737/04

  AVDEYEV AND VERYAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 23691/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 2052/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 1606/02

  POPOV AND VOROBYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 14370/03

  MOSKOVETS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 42900/14 (anhängig)

  DRUZHKOV v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 23226/16

  NIKITIN v. ESTONIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 33566/11

  RAMKOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08

  IDALOV v. RUSSIA (NO. 2)
• EGMR, 17.09.2015 - 13008/13

  KOVYAZIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 4458/10

  MIKALAUSKAS v. MALTA
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 28018/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 39602/05

  FEDORENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 67696/11

  ADEM SERKAN GÜNDOGDU c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 21566/13

  DENISOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 20999/14

  MUKHITDINOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42337/12

  SUSO MUSA v. MALTA
• EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 17116/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 57319/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 35297/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 4512/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 04.03.2010 - 30930/02

  SAVENKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 10638/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 34393/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 28617/03

  BELASHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.09.2008 - 30997/02

  POLUFAKIN AND CHERNYSHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 42239/02

  STAROKADOMSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.05.2008 - 32327/06

  POPKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 61582/10

  SOLODNIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 35121/09

  YURIY KOVAL v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 6277/06

  LYUBUSHKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 28020/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 34959/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 11871/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.04.2013 - 18813/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 21.02.2013 - 3252/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 1600/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 28869/03

  PROSHKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 20641/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 33123/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 23610/03

  MELNIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 6270/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 13476/04

  KHUDYAKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 78146/01

  VLASOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 39742/05

  PIOTR BARANOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 34000/02

  IGOR IVANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 27193/02

  IGNATOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 73329/16

  HASSELBAINK v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 24051/11

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 19936/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 29985/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 1066/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 30251/03

  ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 1555/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 21503/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 14824/02

  SYCHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 7739/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 36904/19

  BUTYANOV v. RUSSIA and 36 other applications
• EGMR, 21.05.2019 - 27728/08

  BYKOVTSEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 41970/11

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 26746/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 30.09.2010 - 23661/03

  ZIROVNICKÝ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 43589/02

  SALAKHUTDINOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 36205/06

  GIOSAKIS c. GRECE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 63955/00

  SUKHOVOY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 50956/15

  LEPESHKINA AND SHILOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 40573/08

  NOVOKRESHCHIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 65911/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 591/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 14807/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 8217/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.03.2009 - 13541/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 34180/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 31.01.2012 - 60272/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 46793/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 7782/04

  KOVALEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 8609/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 29464/03

  AREFYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 7772/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 4871/03

  SKOROBOGATYKH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 14850/03

  MATYUSH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 68337/01

  BUZYCHKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 52697/99

  MIKADZÉ c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 53114/20

  KHOKHLOV v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 29049/12

  STERGIOPOULOS c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 35919/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 42119/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 48562/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 74279/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 918/02

  SOLOVYEVY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 1900/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 35648/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38711/03

  GOROSHCHENYA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 4313/04

  GORGUILADZE c. GEORGIE
• EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 17679/03

  BUZHINAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 40258/03

  YUDAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 37810/03

  BAGEL v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 2945/18

  YALAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 27425/19

  GULAMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 45761/18

  N.K. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 14431/06

  ALEKSANDROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 51389/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 16120/07

  GORBATENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 8681/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 49848/10

  MANEROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 11677/11

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 3937/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 34704/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 08.07.2010 - 14797/02

  ALEKSANDR MATVEYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.06.2010 - 38031/04

  SHULENKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 13173/02

  MUKHUTDINOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 13659/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 24325/03

  GENERALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 3584/02

  TARAU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 3223/07

  ALEKSEY MAKAROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.05.2008 - 67542/01

  GUSEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 11982/02

  NOVINSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.01.2026 - 55237/21

  KISS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 27.02.2025 - 19274/20

  DZHANDZHGAVA v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18

  PAVLIKOVA v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
• EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 43925/16

  MANUKYAN AND AYVAZYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 54994/18

  KOZHUKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 8588/20

  GUZHVA AND MUKHAMETZYANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 40045/20

  FEDAS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 53267/18

  KOZLOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 24655/16

  MUKHIN AND BASIYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.09.2021 - 69522/17

  VOKHIDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.09.2021 - 9146/20

  SHESTUN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.06.2021 - 12590/17

  MERZLYAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.05.2021 - 7118/18

  MAKARENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.07.2020 - 33857/17

  KONDRATYUK AND CHAYKA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 56360/07

  NATALYA VOLKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 49507/10

  DUDNICHENKO AND WAES v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 55214/15

  MARTINS O'NEILL PEDROSA v. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 49689/10

  DZHASYBAYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 7955/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 22965/06

  ZHULIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 54929/09

  MANDRYKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 57215/09

  BURYKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 38911/07

  TUMANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 5969/09

  RYZHIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 41472/06

  CHERNOYVAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 51311/12

  MAKHMUD v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 7243/10

  YEVSTRATOV AND RUDAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 34942/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 9994/06

  PODDUBNYY AND BABKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 76874/11

  DOHERTY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 31691/10

  ISTOMIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 3243/06

  LOSEVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2013 - 5993/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 6479/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 25.10.2011 - 10641/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 39249/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 4320/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 25432/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 12.05.2010 - 69535/01

  KOSITSYN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 921/03

  BORDIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.03.2009 - 39420/03

  BYCHKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 42778/05

  GIOSAKIS c. GRECE (N° 1)
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 522/04

  ALIEV c. GEORGIE
• EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 921/03

  BORDIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 6954/02

  MALTABAR AND MALTABAR v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 21736/18

  MALOBRODSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.07.2024 - 63076/19

  K.A. v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 41223/20

  BAYSHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 52023/08

  BOLDYREV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 63458/19

  ASHIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 57005/18

  OSIPOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 17670/18

  DAVIDOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 37/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 8552/10

  GALOGRE v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 10932/06

  MEDVEDEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 37042/14

  CHAYKA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 39630/03

  RUSAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 17614/08

  NAZAROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 10387/07

  ANTSIFEROV AND NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 7723/07

  SEMENOV AND BACHURINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 31038/09

  ONISHCHENKO AND BERDNIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 4345/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 22631/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 37894/07

  KASHPRUK v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 48883/07

  MATHLOOM c. GRECE
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 19970/04

  HUSÁK c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 1704/06

  RAMISHVILI AND KOKHREIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 02.07.2024 - 24607/20

  B.A. v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 20285/21

  PYZH AND DOBROVOLSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 17181/09

  LESNIKOVICH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 63392/09

  SOKOLOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 257/14

  BARBU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 60249/13

  LYUBIMOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 4176/03

  DANILIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 28183/06
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 67086/01

  KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 82348/17

  D.S. v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 9205/18

  BIKBULATOV AND NEVOLIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 66921/16

  LIPAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 42259/07

  BOYKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 24157/11

  SOLOVEY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 31917/07

  BOCHAROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 41169/02

  KONONOVICH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 34728/06

  CHIRYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA