Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidungen unten: EGMR, 24.02.1983 | EKMR, 03.03.1978 | EGMR, 30.01.1981

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1981,6425
EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1981,6425)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22.10.1981 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1981,6425)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22. Oktober 1981 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1981,6425)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1981,6425) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • NJW 1984, 541
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (158)Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
    The latter may imply safeguarding the moral ethos or moral standards of a society as a whole (see paragraph 108 of the Commission's report), but may also, as the Government pointed out, cover protection of the moral interests and welfare of a particular section of society, for example schoolchildren (see the Handyside judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 25, par. 52 in fine - in relation to Article 10 par. 2 (art. 10-2) of the Convention).

    (Handyside judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, § 48).

    At paragraph 51, it is said that the adjective "necessary" implies the existence of a "pressing social need" for the interference in question (reference to the Handyside judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 48).

  • EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
    In the personal circumstances of the applicant, the very existence of this legislation continuously and directly affects his private life (see, mutatis mutandis, the Marckx judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 13, par. 27): either he respects the law and refrains from engaging - even in private with consenting male partners - in prohibited sexual acts to which he is disposed by reason of his homosexual tendencies, or he commits such acts and thereby becomes liable to criminal prosecution.

    The situation is therefore fundamentally different from that in the Marckx case (paragraph 27 of the judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31) to which the present judgment refers (in paragraph 41): in the former case, the provisions of Belgian civil law complained of applied directly to the applicant who suffered their consequences in her family life; in the instant case, the legislation complained of is formally in force but as a matter of fact it is not applied as regards those of its aspects which are being attacked.

  • EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
    Where a substantive Article of the Convention has been invoked both on its own and together with Article 14 (art. 14) and a separate breach has been found of the substantive Article, it is not generally necessary for the Court also to examine the case under Article 14 (art. 14), though the position is otherwise if a clear inequality of treatment in the enjoyment of the right in question is a fundamental aspect of the case (see the Airey judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32 p. 16, par. 30).

    As regards the other complaints ((a), (c) and (d)), the majority of the Court state that when a separate breach of a substantive Article of the Convention has been found, there is generally no need for the Court also to examine the case under Article 14 (art. 14); the position is otherwise only if a clear inequality of treatment in the enjoyment of the right at issue is a fundamental aspect of the case (reference to the Airey judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, paragraph 30).

  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75
    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
    Nevertheless, this aspect of the applicant's complaint under Article 14 (art. 14) amounts in effect to the same complaint, albeit seen from a different angle, that the Court has already considered in relation to Article 8 (art. 8); there is no call to rule on the merits of a particular issue which is part of and absorbed by a wider issue (see, mutatis mutandis, the Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, pp. 30-31, par. 56 in fine).

    Furthermore, the judgment continues, there is no call to rule on the merits of a particular issue which is part of and absorbed by a wider issue (reference to the Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, paragraph 56 in fine), this being the position in the present case.

  • EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
    As compared with the era when that legislation was enacted, there is now a better understanding, and in consequence an increased tolerance, of homosexual behaviour to the extent that in the great majority of the member States of the Council of Europe it is no longer considered to be necessary or appropriate to treat homosexual practices of the kind now in question as in themselves a matter to which the sanctions of the criminal law should be applied; the Court cannot overlook the marked changes which have occurred in this regard in the domestic law of the member States (see, mutatis mutandis, the above-mentioned Marckx judgment, p. 19, par. 41, and the Tyrer judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, pp. 15-16, par. 31).
  • EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74
    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
    Thus, "protection of the rights and freedoms of others", when meaning the safeguarding of the moral interests and welfare of certain individuals or classes of individuals who are in need of special protection for reasons such as lack of maturity, mental disability or state of dependence, amounts to one aspect of "protection of morals" (see, mutatis mutandis, the Sunday Times judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 34, par. 56).
  • EGMR, 13.08.1981 - 7601/76
    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
    An interference with the exercise of an Article 8 (art. 8) right will not be compatible with paragraph 2 (art. 8-2) unless it is "in accordance with the law", has an aim or aims that is or are legitimate under that paragraph and is "necessary in a democratic society" for the aforesaid aim or aims (see, mutatis, mutandis, the Young, James and Webster judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44, p. 24, par. 59).
  • EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

    Burka-Verbot: In Würde verschleiert

    She pointed out in particular, in this connection, that in the Court's judgments in Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom (22 October 1981, Series A no. 45), Norris v. Ireland (26 October 1988, Series A no. 142) and Modinos v. Cyprus (22 April 1993, Series A no. 259), the Court had recognised homosexuals as victims on account of the very existence of laws imposing criminal sanctions for consensual homosexual activity, on the ground that the choice they faced was between refraining from prohibited behaviour or risking prosecution, even though such laws were hardly ever enforced.
  • EGMR, 12.12.2001 - 52207/99

    V. und B. B., Ž. S., M. S., D. J. und D. S. gegen Belgien, Dänemark, …

    Der Gerichtshof hat diese Auffassung nicht nur in Bezug auf die Normativbestimmungen der Konvention vertreten (z.B. in dem o.a. Urteil in der Sache Söring, § 102, Dudgeon ./. Vereinigtes Königreich vom 22. Oktober 1981, Serie A, Nr. 45; X, Y, Z ./. Vereinigtes Königreich vom 22. April 1997, Sammlung 1997.II, V. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich [GC] Nr. 24888/94, § 72, EGMR 1999-IX, und Matthews ./. Vereinigtes Königreich [GC] Nr. 24833/94, § 39, EGMR 1999-I), sondern auch hinsichtlich der Auslegung der früheren Artikel 25 und 46 der Konvention, was besonders im vorliegenden Fall von Interesse ist und wo es um die Anerkennung der Zuständigkeit der Konventionsorgane seitens einer Vertragspartei geht (o.a. Urteil Loizidou ( vorgängige prozessuale Einreden ), § 71).
  • EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04

    [FRE]

    Some were examined under Article 8 alone, namely cases concerning the prohibition under criminal law of homosexual relations between adults (see Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45; Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142; and Modinos v. Cyprus, 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259) and the discharge of homosexuals from the armed forces (see Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.02.1983 - 7525/76   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1983,14330
EGMR, 24.02.1983 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1983,14330)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.02.1983 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1983,14330)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Februar 1983 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1983,14330)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1983,14330) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (31)Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1983 - 7525/76
    By judgment of 22 October 1981, the plenary Court held, inter alia, that the applicant had been the victim of a breach of Article 8 (art. 8) of the Convention by reason of the existence in Northern Ireland of laws which had the effect of making certain homosexual acts committed in private between consenting adult males criminal offences (Series A no. 45, point 1 of the operative provisions and paragraphs 37-63 of the reasons, pp. 27 and 17-25).

    The existence of the laws in question undoubtedly caused the applicant at least some degree of fear and psychological distress; this is clear from the grounds on which the Court found a breach of Article 8 (art. 8) (see pp. 17, 18 and 24, §§ 37, 40, 41 and 60 of the above-mentioned judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45).

    The unjustified interference with Mr. Dudgeon's right to respect for his private life resided in "the maintenance in force of the impugned legislation in so far as it ha[d] the general effect of criminalising private homosexual relations between adult males capable of valid consent" (Series A no. 45, p. 24, § 61).

    The applicant alleged that the police investigation carried out in regard to him in 1976 (see the judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 15, § 33) had caused him distress, suffering, anxiety and inconvenience.

  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 6538/74
    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1983 - 7525/76
    However, just satisfaction is to be afforded only "if necessary", and the matter falls to be determined by the Court at its discretion, having regard to what is equitable (see the Sunday Times judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 38, p. 9, § 15 in fine).

    Furthermore, it has to be established that the costs and expenses were actually incurred, were necessarily incurred and were also reasonable as to quantum (see, inter alia, the above-mentioned Sunday Times judgment, Series A no. 38, pp. 13-18, §§ 23-42).

  • EGMR, 18.10.1982 - 6878/75
    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1983 - 7525/76
    This being so and having regard to the nature of the breach found, the Court considers that in relation to this head of claim the judgment of 22 October 1981 constitutes in itself adequate just satisfaction for the purposes of Article 50 (art. 50), without it being "necessary" to afford financial compensation (see, for example, mutatis mutandis, the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 18 October 1982, Series A no. 54, p. 8, § 16).

    The Court is not empowered under the Convention to direct a Contracting State to make a declaration of the kind requested by the applicant (see, for example, mutatis mutandis, the above-mentioned Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment, Series A no. 54, p. 7, § 13).

  • EGMR, 06.02.1981 - 6289/73
    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1983 - 7525/76
    Neither the Commission nor, except as indicated above (at paragraph 21), the Government suggested that the applicant had incurred no liability for costs over and above those covered by legal aid (cf., inter alia, the Airey judgment of 6 February 1981, Series A no. 41, p. 9, § 13).
  • EGMR, 07.05.1974 - 1936/63
    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.1983 - 7525/76
    Costs and expenses are recoverable under Article 50 (art. 50) provided that they were incurred by the injured party in order to seek, through the domestic legal order, prevention or rectification of a violation, to have the same established by the Commission and later by the Court or to obtain redress therefore (see, inter alia, the Neumeister judgment of 7 May 1974, Series A no. 17, pp. 20-21, § 43).
  • EGMR, 09.07.2021 - 6697/18

    Syrien: Wartefrist von 3 Jahren für Familienzusammenführung widerspricht Artikel …

    205. The Court reiterates that only legal costs and expenses found to have been actually and necessarily incurred and which are reasonable as to quantum are recoverable under Article 41 of the Convention (see, for example, Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 24 February 1983, § 22, Series A no. 59).
  • EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 43868/18

    WA BAILE c. SUISSE

    Rn. 153 Selon la jurisprudence de la Cour, un requérant ne peut obtenir le remboursement de ses frais et dépens que dans la mesure où se trouvent établis leur réalité, leur nécessité et le caractère raisonnable de leur taux (Dudgeon c. Royaume-Uni (ancien article 50), 24 février 1983, § 20, série A no 59).
  • EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82
    Kamasinski et M. D'Amato (comp. l'arrêt Dudgeon du 24 février 1983, série A no 59, p. 10, § 22), mais comme elle n'a pas ordonné de réparation pécuniaire aucun remboursement n'est dû de ce chef.
  • EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83
    Die Regierung beantragt, der Gerichtshof möge seiner Entscheidung vom 24. Februar 1983 im Fall Dudgeon in diesem Punkte folgen (Série A Nr. 59, EGMR-E 2, 21), in dem er zu dem Ergebnis gelangte, dass die festgestellte Verletzung von Art. 8 per se eine gerechte Entschädigung darstellte.

    50. Für die so getroffene Entscheidung zog der Gerichtshof die zur Umsetzung seines Urteils vom 22. Oktober 1981 vorgenommenen Gesetzesänderungen in Betracht (Série A Nr. 59 [Urteil vom 24. Februar 1983], S. 7-8, Ziff. 11-14, EGMR-E 2, 24).

  • EGMR, 25.04.1983 - 8398/78

    Pakelli ./. Deutschland

    Zum ersten Antrag stellt der Gerichtshof fest, dass er nach der Konvention nicht ermächtigt ist, das Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs aufzuheben oder die Regierung anzuweisen, die beanstandeten Stellen des Urteils zu missbilligen (mutatis mutandis Urteile vom 13. Juni 1979, Serie A Nr. 31, S. 25, § 58, und vom 24. Februar 1983 im Fall Dudgeon, Serie A Nr. 59, S. 8, § 15).

    durch Einschaltung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts auszuräumen (zuvor zitiertes Urteil im Fall Dudgeon, Serie A Nr. 59, S. 9, § 20).

  • EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 45330/99

    S.L. v. AUSTRIA

    The Court observes that, in a number of cases concerning the maintenance in force of legislation penalising homosexual acts between consenting adults, it considered that the finding of a violation in itself constituted sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage suffered (see the Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom judgment (just satisfaction) of 24 February 1983, Series A no. 59, pp.

    Taking account of the facts of the present case I do not see any reason to depart from the established case-law of the Court concerning the maintenance in force of legislation penalising homosexual acts between consenting adults (see the Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom judgment (just satisfaction) of 24 February 1983, Series A no. 59, pp.7-8, § 14; the Norris v. Ireland judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, pp.

  • EGMR, 25.08.2026 - 30915/23

    ALEKSIEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    Such expenses are in principle recoverable under Article 41 (see, among other authorities, The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (Article 50), 6 November 1980, § 40, Series A no. 38; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 24 February 1983, § 25, Series A no. 59; and Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 85-87, ECHR 2000-III).
  • EGMR, 21.04.2016 - 46577/15

    IVANOVA AND CHERKEZOV v. BULGARIA

    This being the case in Bulgaria (see paragraph 44 above, and compare Saghatelyan v. Armenia, no. 7984/06, § 62, 20 October 2015, and contrast Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 24 February 1983, § 22, Series A no. 59, and Pshenichnyy v. Russia, no. 30422/03, § 38, 14 February 2008), the Court accepts that the costs claimed were actually incurred by the applicants, even if for the time being no payments have taken place.
  • EGMR, 06.04.2021 - 10783/14

    HANDZHIYSKI v. BULGARIA

    For their part, the administrative costs (in this case, postage and office supplies - items (b) and (c) of the applicant's claim) incurred by the applicant's representatives in connection with the proceedings before the Court are in principle recoverable under Article 41 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (Article 50), 6 November 1980, § 40, Series A no. 38; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 24 February 1983, § 25, Series A no. 59; Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 85-87, ECHR 2000-III; İpek v. Turkey, no. 25760/94, § 242 in fine, ECHR 2004-II (extracts); and Antonov v. Bulgaria, no. 58364/10, §§ 72 and 76, 28 May 2020).
  • EGMR, 24.10.1983 - 5947/72
    La Cour rappelle qu'elle n'accorde une satisfaction équitable en vertu de l'article 50 (art. 50) que "s'il y a lieu" (voir notamment l'arrêt Dudgeon du 24 février 1983, série A no 59, p. 7, § 11).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01

    BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 19.10.2000 - 31107/96

    IATRIDIS v. GREECE (ARTICLE 41)

  • EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 29999/04

    MAMASAKHLISI v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 74826/01
  • EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 45439/18

    AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK

  • EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 58088/08

    METODIEV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  • EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 27903/15

    ZUSTOVIC v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 9418/13

    KARTOYEV c. RUSSIE et 2 autres affaires

  • EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 35605/97
  • EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 901/05

    Rechtssache P. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  • EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 42126/15

    O.J. v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA and 1 other application

  • EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 1935/07

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 26.10.2017 - 1442/14

    BLAIR ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 15590/14

    TURGUNOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 11/18

    OLIVARES ZÚÑIGA v. SPAIN

  • EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 67312/12

    FIRSTOV c. RUSSIE

  • EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 58811/09

    SAVIN c. RUSSIE

  • EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 576/06

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 7984/06

    SAGHATELYAN v. ARMENIA

  • EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 30422/03

    PSHENICHNYY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 10.02.2004 - 53760/00

    B.B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 03.03.1978 - 7525/76   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1978,10431
EKMR, 03.03.1978 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1978,10431)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 03.03.1978 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1978,10431)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 03. März 1978 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1978,10431)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1978,10431) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EKMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 30.01.1981 - 7525/76   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1981,34048
EGMR, 30.01.1981 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1981,34048)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30.01.1981 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1981,34048)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. Januar 1981 - 7525/76 (https://dejure.org/1981,34048)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1981,34048) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • juris (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht