Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 with regard to body search No violation of Art. 3 with regard to other complaints Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 34 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VALASINAS c. LITUANIE

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 3 en ce qui concerne la fouille à corps Non-violation de l'art. 3 quant aux autres griefs Violation de l'art. 8 Non-violation de l'art. 34 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 14.03.2000 - 44558/98
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

Wird zitiert von ... (255)Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  Furthermore, in considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Even the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68, 74, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  Given that no evidence was presented for the Court to disbelieve the applicant's allegations and that, on the contrary, the Court received some evidence tending to corroborate his claims (see, mutatis mutandis, Timurtaş v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 45, ECHR 2000-VI), the Court finds that the search was conducted in the manner described by the applicant.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.01.2011 - 30696/09

  Belgische Behörden hätten Asylbewerber nicht nach Griechenland abschieben dürfen

  Could the treatment of asylum seekers by the Greek authorities amount to inhuman and degrading treatment? Where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (amongst other authorities, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, §§ 24-30, ECHR 2001-VII, and Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 26565/05

  N. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Where treatment humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity, or arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance, it may be characterised as degrading and also fall within the prohibition of Article 3 (see amongst recent authorities, Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, §§ 24-30, ECHR 2001-VII, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 28.09.2015 - 23380/09

  BOUYID v. BELGIUM

  Many subsequent judgments have highlighted the close link between the concepts of "degrading treatment" and respect for "dignity" (see, for example, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 102, ECHR 2001-VIII; Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, § 114, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts); and Svinarenko and Slyadnev, cited above, § 138).

• EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 6780/18

  ROTH v. GERMANY and 1 other application

  In considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. However, the absence of such a purpose does not conclusively rule out a finding of a violation (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67, 68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III; and Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 5418/15

  Bootsunglück vor Farmakonisi: Griechenland muss Flüchtlinge entschädigen

  Des conditions générales de détention - dans lesquelles s'inscrivent les modalités des fouilles imposées au détenu - peuvent s'analyser en un traitement contraire à l'article 3 de la Convention, tout comme une fouille corporelle isolée (idem, § 36, Valasinas c. Lituanie, no 44558/98, CEDH 2001-VIII, Iwanczuk c. Pologne, no 25196/94, 15 novembre 2001, Yankov c. Bulgarie, no 39084/97, § 110, CEDH 2003-XII (extraits), et Lyalyakin c. Russie, no 31305/09, §§ 75, 12 mars 2015).
• EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 20877/04

  TESTA v. CROATIA

  Although the purpose of such treatment is a factor to be taken into account, in particular the question of whether it was intended to humiliate or debase the victim, the absence of any such purpose does not inevitably lead to a finding that there has been no violation of Article 3 (Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 02.12.2004 - 4672/02

  FARBTUHS c. LETTONIE

  Il prohibe en termes absolus la torture et les traitements ou peines inhumains ou dégradants, quels que soient les circonstances et les agissements de la victime ; la nature de l'infraction dont le requérant est condamné est donc dépourvue de pertinence pour l'examen de la requête sous l'angle de l'article 3 (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, V. c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 24888/94, § 69, CEDH 1999-IX, Labita c. Italie [GC], no 26772/95, § 119, CEDH 2000-IV, Kudła c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 90, CEDH 2000-XI, et Valašinas c. Lituanie, no 44558/98, § 100, CEDH 2001-VIII).

  Le même principe s'applique sur le terrain de l'article 3 de la Convention: l'interdiction de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants reste interdite en toutes circonstances, et les agissements antérieurs de la victime sont sans intérêt sur ce point (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Valašinas c. Lituanie, no 44558/98, § 100, CEDH 2001-VIII).

• EGMR, 06.06.2002 - 53254/99

  KARALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  The relevant domestic provisions regarding the applicant's complaints have been summarised in the Valašinas v. Lithuania (no. 44558/98, 24.7.2001, §§ 92-97, ECHR 2001-VIII) and Puzinas v. Lithuania (no. 44800/98, 14.3.2002, § 15-17) judgments.

  The Court recalls that there is no obligation under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention to have recourse to remedies which are inadequate (see, Valašinas v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 44558/98, 14.3.2000).

  While the detention conditions there, namely the absence of windows and a stroll yard, were established as unsatisfactory by the Ombudsman, the Court considers that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the impugned treatment in that prison attained the minimum level of severity required for it to fall within the ambit of Article 3 of the Convention, given in particular the very short duration of that period of detention and the absence of a medical document or other evidence showing a suffering or damage to the health of the applicant as a result of his keeping at the Kaunas Central Police Department Remand Prison (see, mutatis mutandis, Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, 24.7.2001, §§ 100-113, ECHR-VIII 2001).

• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  [ENG]

  Furthermore, in considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Although the question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a factor to be taken into account, the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 54825/00

  NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE

  Furthermore, in considering whether treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. However, the absence of such a purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of this provision (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 14612/02

  WIKTORKO v. POLAND
• EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 56027/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 34393/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 45603/05

  BUDINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 39084/97

  YANKOV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

  POPOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5774/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 15217/07

  ALEKSANDR MAKAROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.02.2009 - 18660/03

  MALENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 30628/02

  UKHAN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 06.10.2026 - 36384/22

  BAYBASiN v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 72126/14

  CEESAY v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 03.12.2015 - 74820/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 24677/10

  KORYAK v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 50901/99

  VAN DER VEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 30779/05

  MELNITIS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 41216/13

  PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 49169/09

  STELLA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 70719/10

  ZAMFIRACHI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 47229/12

  S.J. c. LUXEMBOURG
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17599/05

  NORBERT SIKORSKI c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5903/10

  STRUCL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 43707/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 53254/99

  KARALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 59304/00

  JANKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17885/04

  ORCHOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 19.07.2007 - 36898/03

  TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 52750/99

  LORSE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 79857/12

  MARIN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 62208/00

  LABZOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 19090/20

  FENECH v. MALTA
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 72710/11

  YARASHONEN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 38812/97

  POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 2585/06

  DANILOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 17892/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 61365/16

  SERAJ EDDIN v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 06.02.2014 - 2689/12

  SEMIKHVOSTOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 16133/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 5711/10

  LALIC AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 71572/01

  BAZJAKS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 35581/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 36941/02

  GUBKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41220/98

  ALIEV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 23.01.2002 - 48321/99

  SLIVENKO ET AUTRES contre la LETTONIE
• EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 58954/09

  OBOTE v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 14344/13

  ALIMOV v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 13099/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02

  DENISENKO AND BOGDANCHIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.09.2026 - 15807/19

  MELLIOU c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 26746/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 49268/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 14248/05

  TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA (NO. 2)
• EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 23284/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 69332/01

  Isolationshaft (Einzelhaft; Kontaktsperre; konkrete Begründung und …
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 23226/16

  NIKITIN v. ESTONIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 42526/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 28825/02

  BUGLOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 32133/11

  KUMMER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 19866/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 14337/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 18280/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 09.09.2010 - 1033/07

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 36932/02

  BAKHMUTSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 17249/12

  SZAFRA?ƒSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 19730/10

  TOMA BARBU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 16563/08

  JULIN v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 4512/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.04.2010 - 32940/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 72277/01

  DVOYNYKH v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 69582/01

  SARDINE c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 12.12.2024 - 55792/20

  ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 23.05.2017 - 22662/13

  MATIOSAITIS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA and 7 other applications
• EGMR, 02.02.2017 - 34515/04

  KULIK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 52160/13

  MOXAMED ISMAACIIL v. MALTA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 33003/11

  NECULA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 10511/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 11871/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 1777/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 20641/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 35555/03

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 1704/06

  RAMISHVILI AND KOKHREIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 73786/01

  CENBAUER v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49529/12

  SYRIANOS c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 5901/13

  POZAIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 48977/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 9643/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 1555/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 19312/06

  VERGELSKYY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 879/02

  DEVRIM TURAN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 9635/13

  DEJNEK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 25820/07

  STANKOV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 15853/08

  VOLOSHYN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 64930/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 17187/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 2889/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 31725/04

  BADILA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 522/04

  ALIEV c. GEORGIE
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 75520/01

  KOZINETS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 16.10.2003 - 55723/00

  FADEYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41707/98

  KHOKHLICH v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 36513/12

  ENASOAIE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 14807/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 5767/10

  MESIC v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 40107/02

  KHARCHENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 3522/04

  SALMANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 39042/97

  KUZNETSOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 27.04.2017 - 34015/07

  ZHERDEV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 46546/12

  MIHAILESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 5747/10

  JEVSNIK v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 29343/10

  EPISTATU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 11463/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 5203/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 32362/02

  VISLOGUZOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 24407/04

  ONOUFRIOU v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 10.09.2009 - 15010/04

  SHKURENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 10638/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 68337/01

  BUZYCHKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.09.2008 - 30997/02

  POLUFAKIN AND CHERNYSHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 42239/02

  STAROKADOMSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 52697/99

  MIKADZÉ c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 64812/01

  ALVER v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 59304/00

  JANKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 31305/09

  Russland wegen Erniedrigung eines Rekruten verurteilt
• EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 75985/12

  BAHNA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 41513/12

  TSOKAS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 16870/03

  VIKULOV AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 6682/10

  FERENC v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 37538/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 48497/06

  DERMANOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 4313/04

  GORGUILADZE c. GEORGIE
• EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 37810/03

  BAGEL v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.03.2004 - 42346/98

  G.B. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 24.10.2000 - 41510/98

  JASIUNIENE v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 60906/16

  NOWAK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 6739/11

  BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 59460/12

  PAWELKOWICZ v. POLAND
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 6813/12

  GEORGIOU ET AUTRES c. GRECE
• EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 18616/13

  TODIREASA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 47603/10

  TIREAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 51012/11

  DRAGOMIR v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  BUTIUC ET DUMITROF c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 30595/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 11677/11

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 1066/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 34704/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 58939/00

  KOUZMIN c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 24325/03

  GENERALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 22/03

  GRIGORYEVSKIKH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 39780/06

  KOTSAFTIS c. GRECE
• EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 25948/05

  KNYAZEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 19735/02

  ATICI v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 09.11.2004 - 68909/01

  KARAKAS c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 11.03.2004 - 40653/98

  IORGOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 37522/16

  VUKU? IC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 17.05.2023 - 13329/21

  MITT v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5471/14

  AMARIKYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 24129/11

  RADU AND RADU-CIUPERCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 36059/12

  BORDENCIU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 35049/08

  SERCE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10

  COSTEL GACIU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 47775/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 47180/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 04.09.2014 - 40514/06

  RUDYAK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 1574/13

  JAEGER v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 10662/06

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 11303/12

  NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 24402/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.02.2012 - 30671/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 60333/00

  SLYUSAREV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.01.2010 - 8258/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 11932/02

  MIKHAYLYUK AND PETROV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 47709/99

  RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. POLAND
• EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 29736/06

  DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 63955/00

  SUKHOVOY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 16437/04

  KOBETS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 27695/03

  SERIFIS c. GRECE
• EGMR, 05.01.2006 - 16944/03

  MIKOLENKO v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2005 - 20841/02

  DROZDOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 03.05.2005 - 16308/02

  PECHEUR c. LUXEMBOURG
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 57325/00

  D.H. ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
• EGMR, 01.06.2004 - 45027/98

  NARINEN v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 39483/98

  NAZARENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 10.04.2003 - 32458/96

  SADAY contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 07.11.2002 - 38654/97

  GORAL v. POLAND
• EGMR - 23968/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.09.2025 - 38198/19

  TÜRK c. TÜRKIYE
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 13406/06

  OSAKOVSKIY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 43543/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 27359/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 31.05.2012 - 18364/06

  GRZYWACZEWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 21978/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 22605/03

  CZECHOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 18.11.2008 - 871/02

  SAVENKOVAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 49984/07

  VERGARA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 76114/01

  SOLOVYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 30323/02

  PANDJIKIDZE ET SIX AUTRES c. GEORGIE
• EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 23693/03

  BOJOLYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 9363/04

  LAZZARI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 30138/02

  NURMAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 33045/19 (anhängig)

  ÜRE c. TÜRKIYE
• EGMR - 13383/22 (anhängig)

  ÇAY c. TÜRKIYE
• EGMR - 19411/19 (anhängig)

  EVREN v. TÜRKİYE
• EGMR - 9912/23 (anhängig)

  KÖSTEK c. TÜRKIYE
• EGMR, 01.07.2025 - 40924/19

  TA?ž c. TÜRKIYE
• EGMR, 26.08.2021 - 47924/13

  KORDONCHIK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 257/14

  BARBU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 20806/10

  CHMIL v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 41358/10

  TUROSINSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 19619/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 37298/05

  ARAZ v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 22680/09

  TUNCER v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 29.06.2010 - 43334/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 01.04.2010 - 37463/04

  AKHMETOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.07.2009 - 39364/05

  KHIDER c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 41653/05
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 3027/03

  SLADKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 67086/01

  KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 22625/02

  MIRONOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 29660/03

  STITIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 45989/06

  RASNIK c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 63767/00

  PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 11801/04

  TSALKITZIS c. GRECE
• EGMR, 05.01.2006 - 10507/03

  DOROCHENKO v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 36549/03

  HARUTYUNYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 54268/00

  QUFAJ CO. SH.P.K. contre l'ALBANIE
• EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 43008/16

  MARCINIAK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 63821/16

  WIERZBICKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 18877/12

  ORLOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 47183/13

  RAKUZOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 68856/13

  UZHAVKA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 5358/14

  X AND Y v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 7262/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 40225/02

  SOTIROPOULOU c. GRECE
• EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 34096/02

  ZIVULINSKAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 27527/03

  L. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 63767/00

  PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 53157/99

  LEDYAYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 34221/96

  D.P. v. POLAND
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 63378/00

  MAYZIT v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 44800/98

  PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 47679/99

  STASAITIS v. LITHUANIA