Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,22859
EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01 (https://dejure.org/2004,22859)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.04.2004 - 71503/01 (https://dejure.org/2004,22859)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. April 2004 - 71503/01 (https://dejure.org/2004,22859)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,22859) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Art. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 4, Art. 41, Art. 46, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Art. 13 MRK
    Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 5-1 with regard to unlawful detention Not necessary to examine Art. 5-1 with regard to place of detention Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 5-4 Not necessary ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ASSANIDZÉ c. GÉORGIE

    Art. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 4, Art. 41, Art. 46, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Art. 13 MRK
    Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de l'art. 5-1 en ce qui concerne la détention arbitraire Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 5-1 en ce qui concerne le lieu de détention Violation de l'art. 6-1 Non-lieu à examiner ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • NJW 2005, 2207
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (288)Zitiert selbst (27)

  • EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    723-24, § 47; and Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 25, § 58).

    Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 25, § 58.

  • EGMR, 12.12.2001 - 52207/99

    V. und B. B., Ž. S., M. S., D. J. und D. S. gegen Belgien, Dänemark, …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    However, as a general rule, the notion of "jurisdiction" within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention must be considered as reflecting the position under public international law (see Gentilhomme and Others v. France, nos. 48205/99, 48207/99 and 48209/99, § 20, 14 May 2002, and Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, §§ 59-61, ECHR 2001-XII).

    And it may, in my opinion, take the form of any kind of military or other State action on the part of the High Contracting Party concerned in any part of the world (see, by way of contrast, Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII, cited in the judgment).

  • EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

    LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    In addition to the State territory proper, territorial jurisdiction extends to any area which, at the time of the alleged violation, is under the "overall control" of the State concerned (see Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), judgment of 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310), notably occupied territories (see Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2001-IV), to the exclusion of areas outside such control (see Banković and Others, cited above).

    The usual form is governmental authority within a High Contracting Party's own territory, but it may extend to authority in the form of overall control of another territory even though that control is illegal (see Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), judgment of 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310), notably occupied territories (see Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2001-IV).

  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    All persons are entitled to the protection of that right, that is to say, not to be deprived, or to continue to be deprived, of their liberty (see Weeks v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 22, § 40), save in accordance with the conditions specified in paragraph 1 of Article 5. The list of exceptions set out in Article 5 § 1 is an exhaustive one (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000-IV, and Quinn v. France, judgment of 22 March 1995, Series A no. 311, p. 17, § 42) and only a narrow interpretation of those exceptions is consistent with the aim of that provision, namely to ensure that no one is arbitrarily deprived of his or her liberty (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 25, § 58, and Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, p. 848, § 42).
  • EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    That right is of primary importance in a "democratic society" within the meaning of the Convention (see De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12, p. 36, § 65, and Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 16, § 37).
  • EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    It would be inconceivable that paragraph 1 of Article 6, taken together with paragraph 3, should require a Contracting State to take positive measures with regard to anyone accused of a criminal offence (see, among other authorities, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, pp. 33-34, § 78) and describe in detail procedural guarantees afforded to litigants - proceedings that are fair, public and expeditious - without at the same time protecting the implementation of a decision to acquit delivered at the end of those proceedings.
  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

    SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII).
  • EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98

    Maestri ./. Italien

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    It follows, inter alia, that a judgment in which the Court finds a violation of the Convention or its Protocols imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found by the Court and make all feasible reparation for its consequences in such a way as to restore as far as possible the situation existing before the breach (see Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I; Menteş and Others v. Turkey (Article 50), judgment of 24 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1695, § 24; and Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

    TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    Under the Court's case-law, the Court may only order the reimbursement of costs to the extent that they were actually and necessarily incurred in order to prevent or obtain redress for the matter found to constitute a violation of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, p. 83, § 77, and Malama v. Greece (just satisfaction), no. 43622/98, § 17, 18 April 2002).
  • EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

    BURDOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
    The Court reiterates that the execution of a judgment given by any court must be regarded as an integral part of the trial for the purposes of Article 6 (see, mutatis mutandis, Hornsby, cited above, pp. 510-11, § 40; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 34-35, ECHR 2002-III; and Jasiūnienė v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 27, 6 March 2003).
  • EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82
  • EGMR, 13.07.1983 - 8737/79

    Zimmermann und Steiner ./. Schweiz

  • EGMR, 22.03.1995 - 18580/91

    QUINN c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76
  • EGMR, 08.04.2003 - 39339/98

    Einschaltung von Privaten / Privatpersonen in die Strafverfolgung …

  • EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 41510/98

    JASIUNIENE v. LITHUANIA

  • EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 36590/97

    GOC ET 48 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 45129/98
  • EGMR, 01.02.2001 - 55346/00

    AYUNTAMIENTO DE MULA contre l'ESPAGNE

  • EKMR, 02.05.1978 - 7597/76

    BERTRAND RUSSELL PEACE FOUNDATION Ltd. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
  • EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

    RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

    RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

  • EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 48843/99

    COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 48205/99

    GENTILHOMME, SCHAFF-BENHADJI ET ZEROUKI c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 44677/98

    MOYA ALVAREZ v. SPAIN

  • EKMR, 16.12.1961 - 712/60

    RETIMAG S.A. contre la REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

  • EGMR, 21.01.2011 - 30696/09

    Belgische Behörden hätten Asylbewerber nicht nach Griechenland abschieben dürfen

    Sometimes the nature of the violation found may be such as to leave no real choice as to the measures required to remedy it (see Assanidzé v. Goorgia [GC], no. 71503/01, 8 April 2004, § 198, ECHR 2004-II; Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, of 30 June 2009, §§ 85 and 88, ECHR 2009-..).
  • BVerfG, 14.10.2004 - 2 BvR 1481/04

    EGMR-Entscheidungen

    Dauert die festgestellte Verletzung noch an - etwa im Fall der fortdauernden Inhaftierung unter Verstoß gegen Art. 5 EMRK oder eines Eingriffs in das Privat- und Familienleben unter Verstoß gegen Art. 8 EMRK -, so ist die Vertragspartei verpflichtet, diesen Zustand zu beenden (vgl. jüngst EGMR, No. 71503/01, Urteil vom 8. April 2004, Ziffer 198 - Assanidze, EuGRZ 2004, S. 268 ;… siehe auch Breuer, EuGRZ 2004, S. 257 ;… Grabenwarter, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, 2003, § 16 Rn. 3;… Polakiewicz, a.a.O., S. 63 ff.;… Villiger, Handbuch der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, 1999, § 13 Rn. 233).
  • EGMR, 05.03.2020 - 3599/18

    Keine Zuständigkeit für aus dem Ausland beantragtes humanitäres Visum, um nach …

    It is presumed to be exercised normally throughout the territory of the State concerned (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 139, ECHR 2004-II).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht