Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IACOV STANCIU v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (183)Zitiert selbst (43)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 12934/02

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  This state of affairs in itself raises an issue under Article 3 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Marian Stoicescu v. Romania, no. 12934/02, §§ 13 and 24, 16 July 2009; Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, § 122, ECHR 2009-...; and Mandic and Jovic v. Slovenia, nos.

  The Court has regularly found violations of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the conditions of detention that have existed over a number of years in Romanian prisons, in particular overcrowding, inappropriate hygiene and lack of appropriate health care (see, among many other cases, Bragadireanu, cited above; Petrea v. Romania, no. 4792/03, 29 April 2008; Gagiu v. Romania, no. 63258/00, 24 February 2009; Brânduse v. Romania, no. 6586/03, 7 April 2009; Maciuca v. Romania, no. 25673/03, 26 August 2009; Artimenco v. Romania, no. 12535/04, 30 June 2009; Marian Stoicescu v. Romania, no. 12934/02, 16 July 2009; Eugen Gabriel Radu v. Romania, no. 3036/04, 13 October 2009; V.D. v. Romania, no. 7078/02, 16 February 2010; Dimakos v. Romania, no. 10675/03, 6 July 2010; Coman v. Romania, no. 34619/04, 26 October 2010; Dobri v. Romania, no. 25153/04, 14 December 2010; Cucolas v. Romania, no. 17044/03, 26 October 2010; Micu v. Romania, no. 29883/06, 8 February 2011; Fane Ciobanu v. Romania, no. 27240/03, 11 October 2011; and Onaca v. Romania, no. 22661/06, 13 March 2012).

• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  Britische DNA-Datenbanken verstoßen gegen die Europäische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008-...; Poghossian v. Georgia, no. 9870/07, §§ 67 to 70, 24 February 2009; Ghavtadze v. Georgia, no. 23204/07, §§ 102 to 106, 3 March 2009).

• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the lack of personal space afforded to detainees and unsatisfactory sanitary conditions (see, in particular, Ciorap v. Moldova, no. 12066/02, § 70, 19 June 2007; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI; Bragadireanu v. Romania, no. 22088/04, §§ 92-98, 6 December 2007; and Iamandi v. Romania, no. 25867/03, §§ 56-62, 1 June 2010).
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  As the Court has repeatedly stressed, it is incumbent on the Government to organise its prison system in such a way that it ensures respect for the dignity of detainees (see, among other authorities, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 229, 10 January 2012, with further references).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  Furthermore, in considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Although the question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a factor to be taken into account, the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 28.01.1994 - 17549/90

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  Moreover, the State's obligation under Article 3 of the Convention to protect the physical well-being of persons deprived of their liberty has been interpreted as including an obligation to provide them with the requisite medical assistance (see, for instance, Hurtado v. Switzerland, judgment of 28 January 1994, Series A no. 280-A, opinion of the Commission, pp. 15-16, § 79; Kudla cited above, § 94; and Istratii and Others v. Moldova, no. 8721/05, 8705/05 and 8742/05, § 49, 27 March 2007).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  Furthermore, in considering whether a treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, the Court will have regard to whether its object is to humiliate and debase the person concerned and whether, as far as the consequences are concerned, it adversely affected his or her personality in a manner incompatible with Article 3. Although the question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a factor to be taken into account, the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 5774/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 35972/05

  5774/10 and 5985/10, § 77, 20 October 2011, with further references).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 25664/05

  LIND v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02

  DRIZA c. ALBANIE
• EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 72967/01

  BELEVITSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 66460/01

  NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 4792/03

  PETREA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
• EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 205/02

  Menschenrechtsgericht rügt erneut Haftbedingungen in Russland
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 62208/00

  LABZOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 22088/04

  BRAGADIREANU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 37213/02

  KANTYREV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 35207/03

  OSTROVAR v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 67253/01

  BABUSHKIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.06.2007 - 12066/02

  CIORAP v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 22635/03

  SULEJMANOVIC c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 12535/04

  ARTIMENCO c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 3036/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 17044/03

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 27.03.2007 - 8721/05

  ISTRATII v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 34619/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 25867/03

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 32362/02

  VISLOGUZOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 10675/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 9870/07

  POGHOSSIAN c. GEORGIE
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 27240/03

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 22661/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 25153/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 08.02.2011 - 29883/06

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 27250/02

  Menschrechtskonvention: Überlange Verfahrensdauer, Zivilrechtsstreit
• EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 27824/95
• EGMR, 01.04.2004 - 50357/99

  CAMBERROW MM5 AD v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 74785/01

  NASTASE-SILIVESTRU c. ROUMANIE

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.10.2026 - 52652/20

  ZAKUTNIY v. UKRAINE and 7 other applications

  Furthermore, the Court is satisfied, on the basis of the examples of domestic case-law cited above (see, for instance, paragraph 52 above), that the domestic courts are aware of the Court's case-law on continuing situations, under which the relevant limitation period starts to run from the date on which detention in inadequate conditions ended, notably after a detainee's release or transfer, except for short absences from the facility for interviews or other procedural measures (see Iacov Stanciu v. Romania, no. 35972/05, §§ 136-38, 24 July 2012; Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 75-78; and Neshkov and Others, cited above, § 199).
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 14249/07

  LAZAR v. ROMANIA

  The relevant parts of the reports issued by the Romanian Helsinki Committee following regular visits that it made in more than 20 prisons throughout the country, including Jilava Prison, are quoted in Iacov Stanciu v. Romania (no. 35972/05, §§ 146-58, 24 July 2012).

  In this connection the Court notes that according to the relevant CPT standards, all the prisoners, without exception, must be able to spend a reasonable part of the day (8 hours or more) outside their cells, engaged in purposeful activity of a varied nature and must be allowed at least one hour of exercise in open air every day and preferably as part of a broader programme of out-of-cell activities (see Iacov Stanciu v. Romania, no. 35972/05, § 121, 24 July 2012).

• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

  Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände

  When dealing with complaints in relation to conditions of detention that do not simply relate to a specific event, but concern a whole range of problems regarding sanitary conditions, the temperature in the cells, overcrowding, lack of adequate medical treatment and so on, which have affected an inmate throughout his or her incarceration, the Court regards this as a continuing situation, even if the person concerned has been transferred to various detention facilities (see Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591/03, §§ 34-36, 26 June 2008; Sudarkov v. Russia, no. 3130/03, § 40, 10 July 2008; and Iacov Stanciu v. Romania, no. 35972/05, §§ 136-38, 24 July 2012).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 03.03.2016 - C-404/15

  Aranyosi und Căldăraru - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Polizeiliche …

  {FN:10} - Nr. 35972/05, 24. Juli 2012.
• OLG Celle, 02.03.2017 - 1 AR (Ausl) 99/16

  Zulässigkeit der Auslieferung zur Strafvollstreckung nach Rumänien aufgrund eines …

  Denn nach den gegenwärtigen europäischen Mindeststandards, wie sie vom Europäischen Komitee zur Verhütung von Folter und unmenschlicher oder erniedrigender Behandlung oder Strafe des Europarats ("CPT") formuliert worden sind, soll bereits Gefangenen, die nicht in überbelegten Hafträumen untergebracht sind, pro Tag über einen Zeitraum von mindestens acht Stunden Bewegungsfreiheit außerhalb der Haftzellen gewährleistet werden (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 14. Februar 2017 - 14249/07, Lazar/Rumänien, Rn. 44;… EGMR, Urteil der Großen Kammer vom 20. Oktober 2016 - 7334/13, Muršić/Kroatien, Rn. 48; EGMR, Urteil vom 24. Oktober 2012 - 35972/05, Iacov Stanciu/Rumänien, Rn. 121).
• EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 40324/16

  BIVOLARU c. FRANCE

  Ces arrêts se réfèrent à l'arrêt de principe Iacov Stanciu c. Roumanie (no 35972/05, 24 juillet 2012) dans lequel, sous l'angle de l'article 46 de la Convention, la Cour a rappelé qu'elle avait fait le constat de violations répétées de la Convention en raison de la surpopulation, du manque d'hygiène et de l'inadéquation des soins médicaux à la prison de Gherla notamment (§ 195).
• EGMR, 20.07.2021 - 39412/19

  POLGAR c. ROUMANIE

  Les tribunaux ont analysé leurs actions en appliquant la jurisprudence de la Cour relative à l'article 3 de la Convention (voir, parmi plusieurs références, les affaires Bragadireanu c. Roumanie, no 22088/04, 6 décembre 2007 ; Iacov Stanciu c. Roumanie, no 35972/05, 24 juillet 2012 ; Rezmiveş et autres c. Roumanie, nos 61467/12 et 3 autres, 25 avril 2017 ; Ananyev et autres c. Russie, nos 42525/07 et 60800/08, 10 janvier 2012 ; Torreggiani et autres c. Italie, nos 43517/09 et 6 autres, 8 janvier 2013 ; Muršić c. Croatie [GC], no 7334/13, 20 octobre 2016 ; et Khlaifia et autres c. Italie [GC], no 16483/12, 15 décembre 2016).
• OLG Celle, 31.03.2017 - 2 AR (Ausl) 15/17

  Rumänien; Auslieferung; Haftbedingungen; Haftraumgröße; Zusicherung

  Denn zum einen soll nach den gegenwärtigen europäischen Mindeststandards, wie sie vom Europäischen Komitee zur Verhütung von Folter und unmenschlicher oder erniedrigender Behandlung oder Strafe des Europarats ("CPT") formuliert worden sind, bereits Gefangenen, die nicht in überbelegten Hafträumen untergebracht sind, pro Tag über einen Zeitraum von mindestens acht Stunden Bewegungsfreiheit außerhalb der Haftzellen gewährleistet werden (vgl. EGMR…, Urteil vom 14.02.2017 - 14249/07, Lazar/Rumänien, Rn. 44;… EGMR, Urteil der Großen Kammer vom 20.10.2016 - 7334/13, Muršić/Kroatien, Rn. 48; EGMR, Urteil vom 24.10.2012 - 35972/05, Iacov Stanciu/Rumänien, Rn. 121).
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 20307/02

  ALI CONTRE LA ROUMANIE ET 120 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  35972/05.
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 42720/10

  GOMOI v. ROMANIA and 3 other applications

  Les conclusions du Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (« le CPT ") émises à la suite de plusieurs visites effectuées dans des prisons de Roumanie et ses observations à caractère général, sont résumées dans l'arrêt Iacov Stanciu c. Roumanie (no 35972/05, §§ 113-129, 24 juillet 2012).

  En outre, la Cour note que la description détaillée que le requérant fait des conditions d'hygiène au dépôt de police d'Arad ou de la qualité de la nourriture est similaire à la situation retenue par la Cour dans beaucoup d'autres affaires de ce type (voir, notamment, Iacov Stanciu c. Roumanie, no 35972/05, §§ 171-178, 24 juillet 2012).

• EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 80825/13

  MUSCALU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 12.11.2015 - 32036/10

  BUTKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 22765/12

  Leaks aus Ermittlungsakten können gegen Menschenrechtskonvention verstoßen
• EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 56854/13

  STORY v. MALTA
• EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 50860/12

  ROSCA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 51318/12

  CONSTANTIN AURELIAN BURLACU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 79857/12

  MARIN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 11353/06

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 14150/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 29999/04

  MAMASAKHLISI v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 22015/10

  VOICU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 10.06.2014 - 13054/12

  BUJOREAN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 23226/16

  NIKITIN v. ESTONIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 67482/14

  LEBOIS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 16179/14

  BUTRIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.01.2020 - 41995/14

  CIUPERCESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 43490/07

  CIPRIAN VLADUÈš POP AND IOAN FLORIN POP v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 55089/13

  DORNEANU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 25333/03

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 36513/12

  ENASOAIE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 29540/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 46546/12

  MIHAILESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 29343/10

  EPISTATU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 19730/10

  TOMA BARBU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 67754/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 65993/16

  Nach Glaubenswechsel kann in JVA andere Ernährung verlangt werden
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 80529/13

  EZE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 55104/13

  MICU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 77638/12

  MANEA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 18.06.2015 - 54966/09

  OPREA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 53168/12

  GHIROGA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 75985/12

  BAHNA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 48372/09

  MARIAN TOMA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 22.04.2014 - 24044/12

  AXINTE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 33003/11

  NECULA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 71723/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 1777/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 60732/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.11.2025 - 10120/23

  VASCAUTANU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 72608/14

  MIHAILESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 11220/14

  MIHAILESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.04.2016 - 32435/13

  MATEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 77444/13

  REBEGEA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 50109/13

  MACOVEI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 65158/09

  DRAGAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 74721/12

  SANATKAR c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 18616/13

  TODIREASA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.04.2015 - 26089/13

  ADRIAN RADU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 47603/10

  TIREAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 51012/11

  DRAGOMIR v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 19320/07

  BUTIUC ET DUMITROF c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 47040/11

  DULBASTRU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 19779/11

  TUDOR v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 69250/11

  ALEKSANDR SMIRNOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 26576/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 1179/10

  ILJINS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 30595/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 11.06.2013 - 62353/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 19.03.2013 - 7910/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 44120/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 44302/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 26.06.2025 - 39150/20

  BENYUKH v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 50702/17

  MIHAILESCU v. ROMANIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 261/14

  FADI FAWZI TAHA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 65980/13

  NENCIU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 24125/09

  DASCALESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 43545/13

  MOCANU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 31127/11

  J.J. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 76884/12

  SOPÂRLA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 6215/14

  VERDES v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 56276/10

  ROSIU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 45825/13

  CURELARIU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 36059/12

  BORDENCIU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 35049/08

  SERCE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10

  COSTEL GACIU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 45720/11

  VOICU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 47775/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 30484/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 70719/10

  ZAMFIRACHI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 33228/05

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 10662/06

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 31968/07

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 66630/10

  MIHAILA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2013 - 14609/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 68492/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 12725/17

  SÎNGEORZAN AND GAITA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 46410/17

  GHEORGHE AND CHIRIBAU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 08.12.2022 - 22085/17

  MERCEA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 23690/15

  MURESAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 39398/14

  ANUTA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 49362/08

  URSEI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2016 - 69191/13

  IONITA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 30.06.2016 - 54734/13

  POP AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 39951/08

  BRÂNDUSE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 2664/10

  IOVITA c. ROUMANIE et 1 autre requête
• EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 68820/13

  MISCHIE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 54539/12

  COJAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 43873/10

  TORAN ET SCHYMIK c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 16980/12

  TUDOR v. ROMANIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 19528/13

  PETRE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 21517/13

  ANDRONIC v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 29101/13

  COZIANU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 11406/11

  NEAGU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 34013/05

  IONUT-LAURENTIU TUDOR c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 7291/09

  OANCEA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 17295/10

  NICOLAE AUGUSTIN RADULESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 45887/06

  ANDREI v. ROMANIA AND MATEI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 19.11.2013 - 28255/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 49549/11

  COTLET v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 24575/10

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 34751/09

  RADU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 4233/09

  AUREL POPA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 67416/11

  STETCO c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 13340/09

  VILLANI c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 23.04.2013 - 34236/03

  LAURUC c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 24378/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR - 40759/13 (anhängig)

  MOROCA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 03.10.2024 - 82237/17

  BUTNARU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 10444/18

  LACATUS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 05.05.2022 - 65758/16

  ANGHEL v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 19944/17

  VAGNER v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 20.06.2019 - 15360/16

  COVACIU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 36606/16

  MARIN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2018 - 29432/16

  DINCA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 2419/16

  MIHAILA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 37988/16

  BANICA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 70787/14

  BENCZE AND DUMITRU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 59646/13

  VANCEA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 18.05.2017 - 72453/14

  NAZARE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 18.05.2017 - 54552/15

  ANCUTA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 18.05.2017 - 57151/14

  ATOMEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 27.04.2017 - 44596/15

  MIHAI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.03.2017 - 60694/15

  DRÎNGA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 78344/14

  VONICA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 257/14

  BARBU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 59291/14

  PASCALAU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 71178/14

  VARVAROI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 38969/15

  STETCO v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 75151/14

  FÂTAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 29.11.2016 - 27129/14

  MIHAILA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 17.11.2016 - 35563/15

  PAVAL AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 17.11.2016 - 15115/15

  MURESAN AND BALOGH v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 7242/14

  BERGHEA c. ROUMANIE et 2 autres requêtes
• EGMR, 03.11.2016 - 41038/14

  BURU AND CURTUSAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 71851/13

  DUMITRU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 22327/13

  CIUCIOIU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 29.09.2016 - 48204/13

  FÎC AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 29.09.2016 - 47867/14

  MARCUS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2016 - 1340/14

  NEDELUS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2016 - 43809/14

  MARINESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 01.09.2016 - 22821/14

  BODA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 03.03.2016 - 57831/13

  CHIRIAC AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 01.10.2015 - 37959/13

  PAUNESCU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 864/13

  DRAGUNA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 45358/13

  RADOVANCOVICI c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 51391/12

  GRÜNFELD v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 32800/12

  AUREL RADULESCU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 19696/13

  ZAKÁR v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 25.02.2014 - 19696/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 03.12.2013 - 61925/11

  HASAN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 12845/08

  OLARIU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 11501/09

  FAUR v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 67591/12

  MARDARE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 35030/14

  CÎRNICI c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 20.05.2014 - 26244/10

  MATEI c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 27117/08

  SZEMKOVICS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 14.05.2013 - 8810/11

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 42119/16

  MUNTEAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.09.2017 - 68175/13

  PREDA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 8503/14

  HASAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 50640/13

  ROSCA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 5818/10

  RADU (II) c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 14.05.2013 - 66925/12

  HÁLÓZATI GYÓGYSZERTÁRAK SZÖVETSÉGE AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY